Now that the tablets are more than a year old, it is becoming clear that the tablet concept works and is selling. But it really depends on the tablet.
A tablet is a mobile device, light, practical, affordable. A classic OS designed for PCs needs more power, which need too much energy, makes devices heavy, hot and short battery life. Ergo even stripped down OSes have trouble. OSes need to be redesigned like iOS and Android for phones. Than you can add features and functions for tablets.
With smartphones and tablets less can be more. They are mobile devices first. Switched on instantly and only physically connected if really needed, mostly to recharge. Sounds obvious, but for PC manufacturers it isn't. The old PC mantra was, pack as much tech as you can. Energy efficiency was an afterthought, notebooks a compromise for portability.
The OS is more important than the features. Android wasn't initially adapted to the screen size of tablets. Therefore many Android tablets were disappointing when compared to the iPad. The OS needs to be conceived with touchscreen operation in mind, not as an afterthought.
So, dear manufacturers, mostly of the Android camp. Here are some specs and principles for you :-)
Screen resolution: That is definitely an area where you can offer real benefits for users compared to Apple products.
Design: Apple has the edge, but there is enough room for everybody. Just don't think design is just a visual exercise - Sony and Toshiba, are you listening? Apples design is very functional, not just nice.
Package size needs purpose dedication: the iPad resembles A4 / letter standard of the most used paper format. Therefore it feels familiar. For something mostly used indoors, the iPad has a great size, especially at home for which Apple designed the iPad. For offices purposes the screen could be bigger. Sharing the device by showing it to somebody else, screen size is relevant. Androids competing directly against the iPad with 10' devices need to come out with more convincing devices or compete seriously on price.
The 7 inch tablets like Samsungs Galaxy Pad are great for people needing a device big enough for tablet use, but small enough to carry them in larger pockets. The 7 inch ones could also be designed for outdoor use.
Motorola, how about a Defy Tablet? In order to be more of a success, the 7 inch needs a redefined environment specification, like robustness to be great outdoor activities as well. Applications are sport and community activies. And commercial applications for people who are constantly on the move, architects, delivery, sales people, contruction workers, foreman, inspectors, police, firemen, community worker, aid organisations, militay.
Navis: Another (complimentary) design spec is the use as a navigation system for cars and trucks. Smartphones mostly are a bit too small to be good navi devices, 7 inch would be great and would rival or better many of the hyper expensive built-in systems.
Ports and connectivity: Android devices have the advantage offering ports for USB for example. The iPad is really deficient in that regard. Maybe Apple made an initial limit of the iOS a design virtue and subsequently a proprietary add-on market opportunity.
Easy upgrades: Let users easily upgrade their device with the newest Android, please. Samsung, Motorola and co, your update policies are most customer unfriendly. I have a Motorola Defy. And that update (non-)experience is not exactly putting the probably nice Xoom on the top of my list :-(.
Now that the tablets are more than a year old, it is becoming clear that the tablet concept works and is selling. But it really depends on the tablet.
A tablet is a mobile device, light, practical, affordable. A classic OS designed for PCs needs more power, which need too much energy, makes devices heavy, hot and short battery life. Ergo even stripped down OSes have trouble. OSes need to be redesigned like iOS and Android for phones. Than you can add features and functions for tablets.
With smartphones and tablets less can be more. They are mobile devices first. Switched on instantly and only physically connected if really needed, mostly to recharge. Sounds obvious, but for PC manufacturers it isn't. The old PC mantra was, pack as much tech as you can. Energy efficiency was an afterthought, notebooks a compromise for portability.
The OS is more important than the features. Android wasn't initially adapted to the screen size of tablets. Therefore many Android tablets were disappointing when compared to the iPad. The OS needs to be conceived with touchscreen operation in mind, not as an afterthought.
So, dear manufacturers, mostly of the Android camp. Here are some specs and principles for you :-)
Screen resolution: That is definitely an area where you can offer real benefits for users compared to Apple products.
Design: Apple has the edge, but there is enough room for everybody. Just don't think design is just a visual exercise - Sony and Toshiba, are you listening? Apples design is very functional, not just nice.
Package size needs purpose dedication: the iPad resembles A4 / letter standard of the most used paper format. Therefore it feels familiar. For something mostly used indoors, the iPad has a great size, especially at home for which Apple designed the iPad. For offices purposes the screen could be bigger. Sharing the device by showing it to somebody else, screen size is relevant. Androids competing directly against the iPad with 10' devices need to come out with more convincing devices or compete seriously on price.
The 7 inch tablets like Samsungs Galaxy Pad are great for people needing a device big enough for tablet use, but small enough to carry them in larger pockets. The 7 inch ones could also be designed for outdoor use.
Motorola, how about a Defy Tablet? In order to be more of a success, the 7 inch needs a redefined environment specification, like robustness to be great outdoor activities as well. Applications are sport and community activies. And commercial applications for people who are constantly on the move, architects, delivery, sales people, contruction workers, foreman, inspectors, police, firemen, community worker, aid organisations, militay.
Navis: Another (complimentary) design spec is the use as a navigation system for cars and trucks. Smartphones mostly are a bit too small to be good navi devices, 7 inch would be great and would rival or better many of the hyper expensive built-in systems.
Ports and connectivity: Android devices have the advantage offering ports for USB for example. The iPad is really deficient in that regard. Maybe Apple made an initial limit of the iOS a design virtue and subsequently a proprietary add-on market opportunity.
Easy upgrades: Let users easily upgrade their device with the newest Android, please. Samsung, Motorola and co, your update policies are most customer unfriendly. I have a Motorola Defy. And that update (non-)experience is not exactly putting the probably nice Xoom on the top of my list :-(.